Clarus Financial Technology

January 2016 Swaps Review – Gains and Losses

Continuing with our monthly review series, let’s take a look at Interest Rate Swap volumes in January 2016.

First the highlights:

Onto the charts, data and details.

USD IRS ON SEF

Using SDRView lets start by looking at gross-notional volume of On SEF USD IRS Fixed vs Float and only trades that are price forming, so Outrights, SpreadOvers, Curve and Butterflys.

Showing that:

And splitting by package type and showing DV01 (adjusted for curves and flys).

Showing that:

And gross notional of non-price forming trades; Compression and Rolls.

Showing that:

USD IRS OFF SEF

Comparing On SEF vs Off SEF for price forming trades.

Shows that Off SEF is >$714b gross notional in January, so 37% of the total vs 63% for On SEF.

USD IRS Prices

Lets now take a look at what happened to USD Swap prices in the month.

Interesting indeed, showing that:

EUR, GBP, JPY Swaps

Lets also take a look at On SEF volumes of IRS in the other three major currencies.

Showing that for price-forming trades JPY volumes were higher than prior months, while the overall gross notional in these three currencies of >$156b in January is just 13% of the USD volume.

And then looking at SEF Compression activity.

Showing much lower volumes in the month.

Thats it for SDR data.

SEF Market Share

Lets now turn to SEFView and SEF Market Share in IRS including Vanilla, Basis and OIS Swaps.

We will start by looking at DV01 (in USD millions) by month for USD, EUR, GBP and by each SEF. In a departure from our usual standard, we will include SEF Compression trades and use a chart to compare the relative share in January with the prior two months.

Showing that:

So what can explain IGDL and Tullet higher and Tradition lower?

Lets look at CME-LCH Switch trades.

CME-LCH Basis Spreads and Volumes

CME-LCH Basis Spreads tightened during the month with 10Y down 0.4bps to 2.65bps and the volumes of these CCP Switch trades might give us a clue.

Using SEFView we can isolate CME Cleared Swap volume at the four major D2D SEFs (on the assumption that this is all CME-LCH Switch trade activity). Lets look at this for the past 3 months.

Showing that:

This explains the relative change in overall share in the previous section and demonstrates how important CME-LCH Switch trades volumes now are to the overall volumes of D2D SEFs, generally representing 10-15% of monthly volumes for these SEFs in DV01 terms.

Global Cleared Volumes

Finally lets use CCPView to look at Global Cleared Swap Volumes for EUR, GBP, JPY & USD Swaps.

Showing that:

And next USD Vanilla IRS comparing LCH Client Clearing with CME OTC on a percentage of total basis.

We know from the December Swaps Review that CME volumes would be much lower if a TriOptima compression run was excluded. So the meaningful comparison is November to January. This shows that November CME was 30% to 70% at LCH and January CME is 32% to 68% at LCH, so similar levels.

Thats it for today.

A lot of charts.

Thanks for staying to the end.

Our Swaps review series is published monthly.

Stay informed with our FREE newsletter, subscribe here.

Exit mobile version