Clarus Financial Technology

Transparency – Where do we go from here?

USD OIS Trading

The chart below shows the entire global USD OIS cleared swaps market in 2024:

DV01 Volumes traded ($m) in USD OIS. Source: CCPView

The chart shows the amount of DV01 traded in benchmark maturity buckets – ranging from 2Y to 50Y – in USD OIS versus both SOFR and Fed Funds. The data is from CCPView.

This data is reported directly by CCPs, with it collected, augmented and standardised via CCPView. But CCPView is not the only place that this risk is reported. Let’s take a look at other sources of data.

SEFs

For all trades that are transacted on a regulated SEF (Swap Execution Facility), SEFView allows us to look at the total risk traded in USD OIS in the same tenor buckets. It shows the total volume transacted per instrument, along with highs, lows, opening and closing prices.

DV01 Volumes traded ($m) in USD OIS. Source: SEFView

This chart poses a simple question – how much of the global USD OIS market is transacted on-SEF. The answer is “it depends!”:

Off-SEF

It doesn’t take a genius to work-out that the SEF market is more transparent than transactions done off SEF. Fortunately, the off-SEF market is covered by trade level reporting via SDRView. How much risk do we see reported for off SEF trades in these maturity buckets?

DV01 Volumes traded ($m) in USD OIS. Source: SDRView off-SEF trades

At first pass, with less than ~$1bn of DV01 reported off-SEF each month, it might look like transparency isn’t great for Off SEF transactions. To the untrained eye, this suggests that less than 10% of global risk is executed off SEF (but still captured by US trade level reporting requirements).

However, that statement ignore the impact of block trades.

How Much of the Market is Transparent?

The off SEF market is split into trades under and over the block (or capped notional) thresholds. We need to estimate the true size of the capped notional trades to estimate how much of the market is actually subject to trade reporting.

We do not know the exact figure, but we can take a pretty good stab at it. Calibrating the total size of the SEF market in SEFView versus the capped notional On-SEF trades allows us to scale-up those capped Off-SEF trades by the same multiplier.

Sparing you the all of the steps, we find the following data for off-SEF trading per tenor bucket:

DV01 Volumes ($m) in USD OIS adjusted for block trades. Source: SDRView off-SEF trades

Running the exact numbers, we have trade-level transparency on 60% of the market. 10Y maturities have the highest level of transparency when compared to data provided by CCPs.

Scoring Transparency

Thanks to the combination of trade-level reporting from SDRs and instrument level volumes from SEFs, we can show that 60% of volumes are subject to transparency requirements:

DV01 volumes ($m) of USD OIS reported to US SDRs and SEFs (“Lit Volumes”) versus those traded elsewhere

The proportion of the market that is transparent month-to-month is pretty stable, and lies between 57% and 64% of volumes in most months.

How Does That Stack Up?

Equity markets are often held up as the paragon of transparency – and yet Nasdaq report that 40-50% of trading activity occurs in so-called “Dark Pools”:

Source: Nasdaq

Whilst we should not make a direct comparison between Dark Pools in equity space and true Dark trading in OTC Rates, it is nevertheless helpful to have some kind of metric in other markets when talking about transparency in Rates trading.

In Summary

Stay informed with our FREE newsletter, subscribe here.

Exit mobile version