Clarus Financial Technology

CCP Disclosures 1Q 2017 – What the Data Shows

Central Counterparties recently published their latest CPMI-IOSCO Quantitative Disclosures and in this article I will highlight what the data shows, similar to my article on 4Q 2016 trends.

Background

Under the voluntary CPMI-IOSCO Public Quantitative Disclosures by CCPs, over two hundred quantitative data fields covering margin, default resources, credit risk, collateral, liquidity risk and more are published each quarter with a quarterly lag.

CCPView now has seven sets of quarterly disclosures, from 30 Sep 2015 to 31 Mar 2017 inclusive, which means we can observe both trends over time at one CCP and compare CCPs to each other.

Lets take a look at some of the main disclosures.

Initial Margin for IRS

Starting with the Initial Margin requirement for Interest Rate Swaps.

Showing:

Looking in more detail at CME IRS and specifically the Client IM.

Showing that after rising modestly each quarter, Client IM dropped from $21.3 billion to $16.4 billion, a decrease of $5 billion or 23%. While House IM dropped more modestly, from $7.5 billion or $6.7 billion.

A case of clients decreasing their use of Swaps or a transfer of some clients to LCH SwapClear?

Lets look in more detail at the LCH SwapClear Client IM.

Showing that LCH SwapClear Client IM has risen each quarter and in-fact the rise in the most recent quarter of $3.7 billion is the lowest in the past year. As such the CME IRS drop is un-likely to be a transfer of client business to LCH SwapClear.

As we noted last time, LCH SwapClear Client IM is now larger than it’s House IM and this trend has continued with Client IM of $55 billion to House IM of $50 billion in the most recent quarter.

In GBP terms (the currency of LCH IM), Client IM is up over the year from £22 billion to £44 billion or 100%, while House IM is up from £35 billion to £40 billion or 15%.

So the growth at LCH SwapClear continues, particularly for client clearing and it will be interesting to see what happens in the next few quarters with Brexit starting to loom on the horizon.

Initial Margin for CDS

Next lets look at the Initial Margin requirement for Credit Default Swaps.

Showing:

So signs of ICE Credit Clear increasing its dominance and LCH CDSClear making some headway against ICE Europe Credit, while the overall growth in the CDS market is much lower than IRS.

Initial Margin for ETD

Next Initial Margin for ETD (Futures & Options).

Showing:

So a big increase at Eurex Clearing while the overall growth in the past year is modest.

More CCPs – DTCC, LME, NCC

We continue to add more disclosure data to CCPView and now that we have all the major Derivatives CCPs, we are adding the major Securities CCPs. Let’s look at the size of IM for a some of these.

Showing:

The size of some of these numbers is surprising and lots of disclosure data to delve into in future.

VM and IM Calls

The flows of VM and IM between CCPs and their members are another interesting disclosure.

First the maximum total variation margin paid to the CCP on any business day and selecting just four CCPs, CME, Eurex, ICE US F&O and LCH SwapClear.

Showing:

Next the maximum aggregate initial margin call on any business day over the period. (Note for some CCPs these figure includes intraday VM, so the IM component would be lower).

Showing:

Credit Risk

In terms of Credit Risk, one of the interesting disclosures is the estimated largest aggregate stress loss (in excess of initial margin) that would be caused by the default of any two participants and their affiliates in extreme but plausible conditions, expressed as a peak day amount in the previous 12 months.

Showing:

No real concern with these amounts as each is well within the Default Resources of the respective CCPs, as given in Disclosures 4.1 (not shown).

Other Disclosures of Interest

A few others to point out (charts not shown):

More Disclosures

CCPView has a lot more CPMI-IOSCO Disclosures covering Interest Rate Derivates, Credit Derivatives, Futures and Options and now Securities, currently from fifteen Clearing Houses each with many Clearing Services and we continue to add more.

With over 200 quantitative data fields and seven sets of quarterly figures from these CCPs, there is no lack of information for analysis and discussion.

If you are interested in this data please contact us for a CCPView subscription.

Stay informed with our FREE newsletter, subscribe here.

Exit mobile version