Clarus Financial Technology

Clearing House Margin calls in Q1 2020

Clearing Houses have recently published data on the magnitude of margin calls they made in Q1 2020 and these are interesting to say the least. Given the massive price volatility we observed in March across all asset classes, we knew these were going to be big numbers, so let’s dive into the detail.

Variation Margin

Let’s start with the maximum total variation margin paid to the CCP on any business day in the quarter, which is quantitative disclosure 6.7.1 in the CPMI-ISOCO disclosures.

For selected clearing services, we show this disclosure for Q1 2020, the prior high since March 2016 and the quarter of the prior high.

Total VM paid to CCP in usd millions

While it is unlikely that all these CCPs had the highest VM paid on the same business day, we may as well add up the first column to get a grand total of $84.6 billion. Wow!

This is the worst case and the true number on the largest business day in the quarter is likely to be somewhat lower, but still it gives an idea of the massive flow of cash (VM is always cash) from member firms to CCPs and of-course from CCPs to member firms

And from the price volatility we observed (see Crashing rates) we know that there will have been massive flows on other days too.

A daily back and forth to make sure that if the music stops for one firm, the money is in the appropriate place to minimize and localize the loss.

A process that worked exceptionally well in the most volatile period since the Great Financial Crisis of 2008.

Initial Margin

Next the maximum aggregate initial margin call on any business day in the quarter, which is quantitative disclosure 6.8.1 in the CPMI-ISOCO disclosures.

For selected clearing services, we show this disclosure for Q1 2020, the prior high since March 2016 and the quarter of the prior high.

Aggregate IM call in usd millions

While it is most unlikely that all these CCPs had the highest IM Call on the same business day, we may as well add up the first column to get a grand total of $87 billion, with the caveat that a chunk of this ($20 billion?) is VM not IM.

But even $67 billion is a large worse case. Again like VM, this back and forth of IM between CCPs and member firms and member firms and clients is important to ensure that default losses are minimised.

However the extent of the IM increases is down to the choice of procylicaility of margin i.e. how much should margin increase between low volatile and high volatile periods. And as my article in Risk.Net shows today, the wide variance in IM percentage changes is surprising and warrants further debate discussion.

Other Disclosures

At Clarus our CCPView product has Quantitative Disclosure data from thirty-six Clearing Houses, each with more than one Clearing Services and this quarterly data starts in Sep 2015.

I cover a few highlights on a quarterly basis, see 4Q19 – Default Resources and today’s article on Initial Margin.

However as with any summary, it is limited and may leave out details that are important for your firm.

I would encourage you to reach out to us and ask about a subscription to CCPView for your firm.

With over 200 quantitative data fields and quarterly figures from September 2015 to December 2020, for 36 clearing houses, most with more than one clearing service, that is a lot of data to analyse.

Stay informed with our FREE newsletter, subscribe here.

Exit mobile version