Clarus Financial Technology

Cross Currency Swaps Review 2024

Happy New Year to all of our readers! Thank you for your continued support and readership. This first blog of the year marks my 500th blog – it’s nice to start the year with a proper achievement! That is over ten years of blogs – if you want to know what I did before Clarus, I documented my trading strategy in a 10th-anniversary blog last year.

With 500 blogs published, I get to still write about my favourite (and most specialised) topic – cross currency swaps. In 2024:

SDRView Volumes

SDRView shows the monthly volumes transacted in Cross Currency Basis swaps. These are vanilla, interbank mark-to-market cross currency swaps.

Volumes in Billions $ of XCCY Basis Swaps in EUR, GBP, JPY and AUD vs USD. Source: SDRView

Showing;

These figures look at average quarterly volumes for the whole of 2023 vs the first three quarters of 2024. As of October, block sizes increased, confusing the picture somewhat.

SDRView Trade Counts

Due to the change in block sizes, I ran the activity data on trade count as well:

Trade Counts of XCCY Basis Swaps in EUR, GBP, JPY and AUD vs USD. Source: SDRView

Showing;

DV01 and Average Maturity Analysis

All of this brings us to DV01. The chart doesn’t look that different to the notional chart, but I will call out the much smaller contribution of USDJPY when measured in DV01 terms:

DV01 in Millions $ of XCCY Basis Swaps in EUR, GBP, JPY and AUD vs USD. Source: SDRView

Finally, I ran the analysis on average maturity, weighted by DV01.

Source: SDRView

There is quite a lot to unpick from that chart. The data is for the whole of 2024, but the impact of the block rules on the average maturities is minimal (trust me, I checked!).

I came here to test a simple hypothesis: trades are getting shorter. That would add weight to a common narrative: “lots more notional is trading, but not that many more trades are happening“. This holds true for both EURUSD & GBPUSD, but not for other currency pairs.

SEF Trading

SEF Trading in vanilla XCCY basis took a real hit in 2024. The proportion of trades reported as SEF executed dropped consistently throughout the year. It reduced from 79% in January to just 65%:

Proportion of XCCY in EUR, GBP, JPY and AUD executed on-SEF by trade count. Source: SDRView

This represents a loss of transparency in the market. For example, you can see the declining volumes executed on-SEF via SEFView:

SEF Market Share of XCCY in EUR, GBP, JPY and AUD in $m equivalent. Source: SEFView

And looking at the SEFs reporting XCCY swaps to SDRs:

Platform ID of XCCY in EUR, GBP, JPY and AUD by DV01. Source: SDRView

Showing;

Recall that Cross Currency Swaps remain uncleared. Maybe the execution protocol of checking CSAs and hence discount currency means that SEF execution is poorly suited for end-users? Feel free to discuss in the comments below.

In Summary

Record Growth in Volumes: Cross currency swaps saw a 12% increase in trade counts and a 21% rise in notional volumes, reaching over $7 trillion in 2024, with record activity in EURUSD, JPYUSD, and AUDUSD.

Diverging Trends in Trade Counts: EURUSD trades grew by 23%, AUDUSD by 16%, while GBPUSD trades declined by 5%. JPYUSD saw modest trade growth despite a sharp increase in notional volumes.

Average Maturities Declining: Average maturities decreased in EURUSD (from 10 to 8 years) and GBPUSD, while JPYUSD maintained stability at 5 years, indicating a shift toward shorter-term trades in some of the major currencies.

Reduced SEF Market Transparency: On-SEF execution dropped from 79% to 65% during 2024, raising concerns over declining market transparency and the limited participation of dealer-to-customer (D2C) SEFs.

Stay informed with our FREE newsletter, subscribe here.

Exit mobile version