Clarus Financial Technology

Mechanics and Definitions of RFR Cross Currency Swaps

Maintaining Market Standards

I opened an email from ISDA with dismay earlier this week. Entitled “RFR Conventions – Product Table” I got excited that someone had formalised the process we use to create some of our most widely read blogs such as:

Obviously we try to keep on top of these things, but with the whole market moving to RFRs, there are a lot of Clarus Blogs out there that we really need to revisit and recast in an RFR world. I thought that ISDA had stepped in (hoorah!) but unfortunately the entry in the table for Cross Currency Swaps was quite disappointing:

Very few examples” of Current/Expected RFR conventions for XCCY swaps??!! Let’s put that right today on the Clarus blog!

RFR vs RFR Conventions for Cross Currency Swaps – D2D Markets

As we wrote about in our LIVE BLOG: RFR FIRST IN CROSS CURRENCY SWAPS, Cross Currency Swaps have seen a particularly successful transition since September 21st. We’ll show you fresh data at the end of this blog too.

It is therefore worth laying out the conventions for these RFR vs RFR Cross Currency Swaps:

For the avoidance of doubt, there are no shifts in observation periods for the RFRs in either currencies. We are simply seeing a payment delay and RFRs are always applied to their “natural” dates.

Similar conventions can be seen in the January 2020 ARRC publication, “Recommendations for Interdealer Cross-Currency Swap Market Conventions” but that document falls short of stating explicitly what the standards should be. Hopefully we are clearer above that this is exactly what is trading NOW in interdealer markets.

And finally, an @ISDA! Here are concrete examples of the current RFR Conventions in Cross Currency Swap markets 🙂

RFR vs RFR XCCY Volumes

Making this relevant to what is going through the markets right now, we are seeing almost 100% of SDR reported volumes in GBPUSD, USDJPY and USDCHF transition to RFR vs RFR since the September 21st date. Our daily charts from SDRView Researcher summarise it nicely;

Showing;

The weekly chart makes it clearer:

We are tracking slightly below the activity levels we enjoyed before September 21st (seeing ~200 trades per week at the moment) but that is well within the boundaries of variability for activity in cross currency swaps markets.

EURUSD markets are also being impacted by this transition. With 3 of the largest five currency pairs trading RFR vs RFR, it appears there is an increasing desire to trade €STR vs SOFR as well. Between 18% and 42% of trades are now RFR vs RFR in EURUSD:

EURUSD by trade count

Dealer to Client Markets

As we said stated in our original XCCY Swap blog:

Market Conventions

The Cross Currency Swap market has always been split in two – the Dealer-to-Dealer market versus the end-user Dealer-to-Client market. The “market standard” product that trades in the Dealer community is far removed from what an end-user client typically requires. However, it has evolved into the most efficient risk-transfer mechanism that we have for basis risk.

https://www.clarusft.com/mechanics-of-cross-currency-swaps/

The same still applies in an RFR world. Clients are very unlikely to want to trade with FX resets – they require their hedges to be fixed notional to precisely match cashflows. Equally, they may not want Floating-Floating exposures. Expect Fixed vs Fixed (which are of course NOT impacted by the move to RFRs) or Fixed vs Float to be far more common requests for clients. Finally, even if they are trading Float vs Float, there is nothing to say that both sides need to be an RFR. We have seen some SONIA vs USD LIBOR and SOFR vs EURIBOR reported to the SDRs for example. With EURIBOR continuing to be published, these structures are expected to keep on trading, but the data suggests they will mainly be in the client market.

In Summary

Stay informed with our FREE newsletter, subscribe here.

Exit mobile version